DoRevision

Evaluation Station

Q4, the 20-mark monster: how to agree (or not) with a critical view of the text, back it with real evidence, and never drift from the statement.

⏱️ 17 min 🎯 13 activities
Best used for
Homework Independent study Mock preparation

Use it, the way the marks are given

Free interactive practice at using the material, which is what the marks are for.

Start revising free

What you'll cover

Evaluation Station

**Q4 (20 marks, AO4)** is the biggest question on the paper. It hands you a **critical statement** about the text and asks: **to what extent do you agree?** It rewards a genuine, evidenced opinion, not more technique-spotting. This module builds the Q4 answer step by step.

The extract

Read this short passage carefully. You will be sent back to it more than once: *By the time the bus pulled in, Priya had rehearsed what she would say a hundred times. She stepped down and there he was. Older, smaller somehow, his coat too big for him now. He lifted a hand, not quite a wave. For three years she had promised herself she would be cold. But her feet were already moving, faster now, and the speech dissolved in her throat. When she reached him she did not know whose arms went round whom first. Neither of them spoke. The rain fell on, and for once she let it.*

The statement

Q4 gives you a **critical view** to weigh up. For this extract: > *"In this ending, the writer shows that forgiveness is stronger than anger."* "To what extent" is an invitation, not a trap. You may agree, disagree, or (very often the strongest answer) **partly** agree. What you may not do is avoid deciding: an answer that describes the ending without measuring it against the statement is not an evaluation at all. Now find your own evidence, before anybody tells you where to look.

Evidence for

Tap the TWO phrases that most show forgiveness winning out over the anger Priya had planned.

  • For three years she had promised herself she would be cold. But her feet were already moving, faster now, and
  • the speech dissolved in her throat
  • . When she reached him
  • she did not know whose arms went round whom first
  • .
  • Neither of them spoke
  • .

Evidence against

Now the other side. Tap the phrase suggesting that even AFTER the embrace, something between them is still unresolved.

  • She stepped down and there he was.
  • Older, smaller somehow
  • , his coat too big for him now. He lifted a hand,
  • not quite a wave
  • . ... When she reached him she did not know whose arms went round whom first.
  • Neither of them spoke
  • .

Evidence, both ways

You have just found both sides, which is what a top Q4 does: it uses a **range** of the text and shows the picture is not simple. That is why "partly agree" so often scores highest:

The shape of a paragraph

A Q4 paragraph has a shape worth learning. Open by saying how far you _____ with the statement. Support that with a short, precise _____ from the text, and say what it makes the reader notice. Then weigh the _____ side, using a different part of the passage. Finally, tie the paragraph back to the _____, so the examiner can see you are still answering the question that was asked.

agree quotation other statement disagree technique same plot

A clear line of argument

The best Q4 answers commit to a position and develop it across the whole answer. Four things keep that line straight:

Rank the answers

Here are three Q4 responses to the forgiveness statement. Put them in order from WEAKEST to STRONGEST.

  • A: "The writer uses a simile and some short sentences in the ending."
  • B: "I agree forgiveness wins, because they hug at the end."
  • C: "Largely I agree. Her rehearsed coldness 'dissolved', showing forgiveness overtaking anger. Though 'neither of them spoke' hints the hurt is not fully healed."

What is B missing?

Response B reads: "I agree forgiveness wins, because they hug at the end." It clearly beats A, but it will not reach the top band. What is it missing?

  • A precise quotation, an explanation of its effect, and any weighing of the other side
  • A clear position on the statement
  • Any reference to the text at all
  • Enough words: it is simply too short

Spot the drift

A student is answering Q4 on the forgiveness statement. Which sentence **drifts** from the question and would lose marks?

  • "The writer also uses a range of interesting adjectives throughout the extract."
  • "I largely agree, because her planned speech 'dissolved in her throat'."
  • "This suggests forgiveness overtakes the anger she had nursed."
  • "However, 'neither of them spoke' suggests some distance remains."

Write your evaluation

Q4 practice. Write ONE evaluative paragraph responding to the statement: "the writer shows that forgiveness is stronger than anger."

  • Open by stating how far you agree: fully, largely, partly, or not at all
  • Support it with a precise quotation, and say what it makes the reader notice
  • Weigh the other side, using a DIFFERENT part of the passage
  • End by returning to the statement, so the paragraph closes where the question is

In the exam

Q4 is worth 20 marks and tests _____. It gives you a critical statement and asks how far you _____. Use a range of the text, weigh both sides where the evidence allows, and above all keep returning to the _____. Drifting into generic language analysis is how these marks are _____.

AO4 agree statement lost AO2 disagree techniques earned