Two Texts Compared
Q4, the 16-mark comparison: two writers, two opposite opinions. Compare not just what they think but how their writing makes you feel it.
Revise this, the fun way
Play it interactively, earn XP and build a streak — free.
Start revising freeWhat you'll cover
Two Texts Compared ⚖️
**Q4 (16 marks, AO3)** is Paper 2's big comparison. Two writers, one theme, and usually **opposite** opinions — your job is to **compare** them. And not just what they think: Q4 wants how each writer's **methods** make you feel their viewpoint. This module builds that double comparison.
Text A — a tech column, 2021 📱
Two writers on living with smartphones. First, an enthusiast (written for this module — your real sources will differ): *What a time to be alive. In my pocket sits a device that would have seemed pure sorcery to my grandmother — a camera, a map, a library, a link to everyone I love. My daughter video-calls her cousins in Lagos as easily as calling downstairs. We are, for the first time in history, never truly alone. People love to moan about screens, but I say: look up from your worrying and marvel. We have built magic, and we get to hold it.*
Text B — a magazine essay, 2022 📵
Now a very different view on the same subject: *We are the most connected generation in history, and the loneliest. Watch a train carriage: twenty people, twenty glowing rectangles, not one word exchanged. My own phone buzzes like a needy pet, and I obey — at dinner, in bed, mid-conversation with the people I claim to love. We were promised the world in our pockets. What we got was a leash. I do not want to look at another screen. I want to look at a face.*
A different kind of compare 🎯
Careful: Paper 2 asks you to compare **twice**, in different ways. • **Q2** compared the **information** in the texts (AO1) — the facts and ideas. • **Q4** compares the writers' **attitudes/viewpoints** AND the **methods** they use to convey them (AO3). Same texts, but now you weigh *how they feel* and *how the writing shows it*.
What to compare
For Q4 (AO3), what exactly must you compare between the two texts?
- The writers' different attitudes AND the methods they use to convey them
- Only the factual information in each text
- Only the language techniques in Text A
- Which of the two texts is better written
Name the viewpoints 🧭
Before comparing, pin down each writer's **attitude**: • **Writer A** is **enthusiastic** — technology is "magic", a source of wonder and connection. • **Writer B** is **cynical** — technology is "a leash", isolating us even as it connects us. Two clear, opposite viewpoints. Now the marks come from comparing them — and how each writer builds them.
Writer A's attitude
An interactive activity.
Writer B's attitude
An interactive activity.
Compare the methods too 🔀
A top Q4 doesn't just say the writers disagree — it shows **how** each conveys their view, side by side. Both reach for a **metaphor**, but in opposite directions: Writer A's "**magic**" fills the reader with wonder, whereas Writer B's "**leash**" makes technology feel like a trap. Comparing the *methods* is where the marks climb.
A strong comparison
Which sentence is a strong Q4 COMPARISON point — linking both writers' attitudes AND their methods?
- Writer A is celebratory, using the metaphor "magic", whereas Writer B is bitter, using "a leash" to show entrapment.
- Text A is about phones and Text B is also about phones.
- Writer A uses a list of three.
- Both texts are non-fiction and quite short.
Rank the comparisons
An interactive activity.
Why C is strongest
Why is response C the strongest Q4 answer?
- It compares both writers' attitudes AND their methods, with evidence and a connective
- It is simply the longest of the three
- It only discusses Writer A in detail
- It avoids taking any position
Write the comparison
An interactive activity.
In the exam 🎓
Comparison mastered. Grade-9 habits for Paper 2 Q4: • Compare the writers' **attitudes** AND their **methods** — never just what they say (that\'s Q2). • Weave **both** texts into each point with a **connective** (whereas / in contrast / similarly), backed by a quotation from each. • Always link a method to its **effect** on the reader — how the writing makes you share (or resist) the viewpoint.