Written Annotation: Why It's Scored, Not Optional
The words next to your work are marked too. Learn to annotate decisions rather than describe what is already visible, in the vocabulary of your own discipline.
Revise this, the fun way
Play it interactively, earn XP and build a streak, free.
Start revising freeWhat you'll cover
The words are marked too ✒️
Art and Design has no written exam. Everything is assessed from what you submit, and **written annotation is part of that submission, not a decoration on it**. The specification asks you to record ideas, observations and insights **visually AND through written annotation**, using the specialist vocabulary of your discipline. A portfolio of beautiful work with silent pages leaves marks on the table, whichever title you are taking.
Describing or deciding? 🪞
Almost every weak annotation fails the same way: it tells the examiner something they can already see. Strong annotation tells them something they cannot: what you were thinking.
Which annotation scores? 🥇
Two students annotate the same photographic test print. Which annotation earns the marks?
- I shot at a wider aperture to throw the fence out of focus, so the eye stays on the hands
- This is a black and white photograph of a person standing near a fence
- I really like this photo and I think it is my best one so far
- I took this photo on Tuesday afternoon and printed it in the darkroom
What an annotation has to do 🧰
A line of annotation that scores usually does four things, and they fit in two sentences:
Match each title to vocabulary an examiner would expect
- Photography
- Textile Design
- Three-dimensional Design
- Graphic Communication
- Aperture, depth of field, exposure, contrast
- Warp and weft, resist dyeing, appliqué, tension
- Maquette, armature, join, load, finish
- Typeface, hierarchy, grid, kerning, palette
Where does it go? 📍
Select the TWO statements that describe how annotation should appear in a portfolio.
- Beside the work it refers to, so the reader can see both at once
- Throughout the project, written as the decisions are made
- Collected into one written evaluation at the end of the project
- Only on the final pieces, since those are what is assessed
The most common way to under-score ⚠️
Examiners on both boards report the same thing: candidates treat annotation as **padding**, and lose marks they had already earned in the studio. The fix is one habit. Before writing a line, ask: **could someone work this out just by looking?** If yes, it is description, and it is worth nothing. Write the part they could not see instead: the choice you made, the reason, and what you will do about the result.
Build the annotation 🧱
An interactive activity.
Find the thinking 🎯
An interactive activity.
Which line is dead weight? 🔍
In that annotation, which sentence adds least, and why?
- "This is my third print of the same negative", because it only counts attempts
- "I burned in the top corner for eight seconds...", because it is too technical
- "The paper is the same warm-tone stock as before", because paper does not matter
- None of them, since every sentence in an annotation is credited
A frame you can reuse 📝
I tried _____, and the result was that the surface became _____. That matters because my intention is _____. On balance it took me _____ what I want, so next I will _____.
Annotate it ✍️
An interactive activity.