Deindividuation and the Stanford Prison Experiment
Why do people act differently in a crowd? Explore deindividuation, the Stanford Prison Experiment, and how crowds can behave for good or ill.
Revise this, the fun way
Play it interactively, earn XP and build a streak, free.
Start revising freeWhat you'll cover
Different in a crowd 👥
People sometimes behave differently in a large crowd than they would alone. Psychologists explain this with **deindividuation**. This module covers deindividuation, a famous study that shows it, and how crowds can act for good or for ill.
Key terms 📖
Learn these before you begin:
Match each term to its meaning
- Deindividuation
- Anonymity
- Bystander effect
- Crowd behaviour
- Losing your individual identity in a group
- Not being identifiable as an individual
- Being less likely to help when others are present
- How people act as part of a large group
What is deindividuation?
What does deindividuation mean?
- Losing your sense of individual identity in a crowd or group
- Following a direct order from someone in authority
- Changing your view to match a group's opinion
- Helping a stranger in an emergency
How deindividuation works 💡
Deindividuation is more likely when being in a **crowd**, wearing a **uniform** or staying **anonymous** makes people feel less identifiable as individuals. They can then act in ways they would not alone. This can be **anti-social**, such as aggression in a mob, or **pro-social**, such as joining in to help at a charity event.
The deindividuation process
An interactive activity.
What increases it?
Select the TWO things that increase deindividuation.
- Being in a large crowd
- Wearing a uniform or mask
- Being alone and clearly identified
- Being named and singled out
Deindividuation frame
Deindividuation is losing your sense of individual _____ in a group. It is more likely when people feel _____, for example in a large crowd or a _____. It can lead to anti-social or _____ behaviour.
The Stanford Prison Experiment 🔬
A famous study of this is the **Stanford Prison Experiment** by **Haney, Banks and Zimbardo (1973)**, 'A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison'. The researchers reported that student volunteers, who were **very similar and non-aggressive** at the start, behaved very differently once they were in a group and wearing a uniform. Zimbardo read this through **deindividuation** and **conformity to a role**.
What was reported?
What did Zimbardo and colleagues report from the Stanford Prison Experiment?
- Non-aggressive students behaved harshly once in a uniform and a group
- Students refused to take part in any group role
- Students behaved exactly the same as before the study
- Students became calmer and more polite in the group
Match each idea to its example
- Deindividuation
- Conformity to a role
- Anti-social crowd behaviour
- Pro-social crowd behaviour
- Losing individual identity in a uniform
- Acting as the group role expects
- Aggression in an angry mob
- Joining in to help at a charity event
The study frame
In the Stanford Prison Experiment, Haney, Banks and _____ (1973) reported that similar students changed once in a group and a _____. Pearson reads this through deindividuation and conformity to a _____. Crowds can act in anti-social or _____ ways.
Apply deindividuation
An interactive activity.
Explain and evaluate
An interactive activity.