DoRevision Sign up free

Development Theories Lab

Why are some countries rich and others poor? Weigh Rostow against Frank, order the stages of growth, and match each development approach to who drives it.

⏱️ 16 min 🎯 13 activities Teachers Not yet rated Students Not yet rated

Revise this, the fun way

Play it interactively, earn XP and build a streak, free.

Start revising free

What you'll cover

Rich world, poor world 🌍

Why are some countries rich and others poor? Geographers use **development theories** to explain global inequality. Two of the most famous disagree sharply: **Rostow** and **Frank**. This lab pits them against each other.

Rostow's five stages 🪜

Rostow's **modernisation theory** (1960) says every country develops through the **same five stages**, climbing higher as it invests and modernises. It is **optimistic** and looks at what happens **inside** a country, not at its relationships with others.

Rostow's ladder

An interactive activity.

Rostow's view

According to Rostow, how does a country develop?

  • By climbing through stages as it invests and modernises
  • By being exploited by richer countries
  • By staying a traditional farming society
  • It never really changes at all

Frank's dependency theory 🔗

Frank saw the world split into a wealthy **core** and a poorer **periphery**. The core grew rich by **exploiting** the periphery, through colonial history and unfair trade. This keeps poorer countries **dependent** and underdeveloped. It is a **structural** view that looks at relationships **between** countries.

Frank's view

What does Frank blame global inequality on?

  • Richer core countries exploiting poorer periphery ones
  • Poorer countries simply failing to modernise
  • A natural set of development stages
  • The weather and physical geography alone

Match each term to its key idea

  • Rostow
  • Frank
  • The core
  • The periphery
  • Countries climb five stages of growth
  • The rich exploit the poor to stay ahead
  • Wealthy, industrialised countries
  • Poorer countries supplying cheap goods and labour

Two ways to develop 🏗️

Development projects come in two styles: - **Top-down**: large projects decided by governments or **IGOs** (intergovernmental organisations like the World Bank), such as a huge dam. - **Bottom-up**: small projects led by **local communities**, often run by **NGOs**, using appropriate technology to meet local needs.

Match each actor or approach to its description

  • Top-down
  • Bottom-up
  • A TNC
  • An NGO
  • A large project decided by governments or big bodies
  • A small project led by the local community
  • A large company operating across many countries
  • A non-profit charity, often running local projects

Bottom-up features

Select the TWO features of bottom-up development.

  • It is led by local communities
  • It uses appropriate, small-scale technology
  • It relies on huge projects run by central government
  • It ignores what local people actually need

Choose the approach

An interactive activity.

Development-theories frame

Rostow's theory says countries develop by climbing five _____, while Frank's theory blames inequality on the rich _____ exploiting the poor periphery. Development can be _____-down, using large government projects, or bottom-up, using small local ones often run by _____.

stages core top NGOs seasons periphery bottom TNCs

The big contrast

Which statement best contrasts the two theories?

  • Rostow is optimistic about internal progress; Frank blames external exploitation
  • Both say inequality is caused by exploitation
  • Both describe the same five stages of growth
  • Neither theory tries to explain global inequality