DoRevision

The Nazi War Economy

You might expect Germany to have thrown everything into the war from 1939. It did not. See how the early-war economy really worked, and why it was not yet the total war that came later.

⏱️ 20 min 🎯 15 activities
Best used for
Homework Independent study Cover lesson

Argue it out before you write it

A free interactive activity to open a lesson and get the thinking started.

Start revising free

What you'll cover

Not yet an all-out war economy

It is easy to assume Germany poured everything into the war from the very first day in 1939. In fact, it did not. ⭐ In the early war, Germany fought quick campaigns and tried to keep normal life comfortable. Its economy was not yet fully turned over to war. ⚠️ Distinguish the early war from the total war that came later. The strongest answers refuse to treat 1939 to 1945 as one unchanging economic state.

What you might expect, and what happened

The early-war economy was surprising. Hold the expectation against the reality.

Order how the early-war economy worked

Put the logic of the early-war German economy into order.

  • Germany plans for short, sharp wars rather than a long one
  • Quick victories bring in plunder and forced labour from conquered lands
  • Consumer goods keep flowing at home to protect morale
  • The economy is therefore not yet fully mobilised
  • Only when quick victory fails does a shift to total war begin

How the early economy was run

How was the German economy run in the early war, from 1939 to 1942?

  • It was not fully mobilised; Germany fought quick campaigns, kept consumer goods flowing to protect morale, and lived partly off plunder from conquered lands
  • It was fully mobilised for total war from the first day
  • It had already collapsed by 1940
  • It was a free market with no government direction

Words for the war economy

Five words that let you explain how the economy worked, rather than just describe it.

Spot the early-war economy

Three of these describe the German economy from 1939 to 1942. Choose the three.

  • Quick blitzkrieg campaigns
  • Keeping consumer goods flowing
  • Relying on plunder and forced labour
  • Full total-war mobilisation from 1939
  • A long war of attrition planned from the start

Why 1939 to 1945 is not one story

The sharpest answers refuse to treat the whole war as a single economic effort. Early on, Germany avoided the sacrifices of total war. Quick victories seemed to make them unnecessary, so it kept everyday comforts alongside weapons and leaned on the wealth of conquered lands. Only when the quick wins ran out did that change. From the middle of the war, Germany was forced towards true total war, with far deeper sacrifice, which the next module covers. Marking that turning point is the grade 9 move.

Match each war-economy term to its meaning

  • Blitzkrieg
  • Mobilisation
  • Plunder
  • Guns and butter
  • A war of quick, sharp campaigns
  • Turning the economy fully over to war
  • Resources seized from conquered lands
  • Supplying both weapons and consumer goods

Find the sentence that distinguishes the phases

A student writes about the war economy. Select the ONE sentence that DISTINGUISHES the early war from the later one.

  • In the early war Germany kept guns and butter and fought quick campaigns, but later, as quick victory failed, it shifted to a far more total war economy.
  • The German economy was in exactly the same state throughout the whole war.
  • Germany fully mobilised for total war from the very first day.
  • The war had no effect on the German economy at all.

A worked example: expecting a quick win

Imagine a team that expects to win a contest quickly, so it does not cancel its holidays or work late; it keeps life comfortable and dips into savings to cover the extra costs. Only when the contest drags on far longer than expected does the team finally cancel everything and throw all its effort in. Hold that idea. People who expect a quick win often hold back their full effort at first, and only commit everything once the easy victory fails to arrive.

Complete the account of the war economy

The strategy of quick, sharp campaigns was _____. Turning the economy fully over to war would be _____. Trying to supply weapons and consumer goods at once was the policy of _____. Wealth seized from conquered lands was _____. People from those lands made to work for Germany were _____.

blitzkrieg mobilisation guns and butter plunder forced labour rationing boycott propaganda inflation tariff

Judge the early-war economy

Which is the soundest judgement on the German war economy from 1939 to 1942?

  • It was not fully mobilised: a limited war economy relying on quick campaigns, plunder and keeping consumer goods flowing, unlike the total war that came later
  • It was a total-war economy from the very beginning
  • It stayed exactly the same across the whole war
  • It produced nothing at all for the war effort

Early war, and total war

The strongest answers set the two phases against each other. This module owns the first; the next owns the second.

Judge the economy like an examiner

You are marking three claims about the German war economy. For each, choose the soundest judgement.

  • An essay says Germany fully mobilised its economy from 1939. Is that safe?
  • An essay treats the whole war 1939 to 1945 as one economic state. Is that safe?
  • An essay says the early economy relied only on German production. Is that safe?

Write: the German economy in the early war

How was the German economy run in the early years of the war, from 1939 to 1942? Explain the strategy, its impact on the people, and how it differed from later total war, then reach a judgement. This is written in English and is not auto-marked.

  • Explain the blitzkrieg strategy
  • Explain guns and butter and protected morale
  • Explain the reliance on plunder and forced labour
  • Contrast the early war with later total war
  • Reach a supported judgement