DoRevision

Political Parties and Left-Right Politics

What parties are for, whether they strengthen democracy or narrow it, and the two starting points that explain every traditional left-wing and right-wing position on the major issues.

⏱️ 24 min 🎯 15 activities
Best used for
Independent study Intervention Cover lesson

Use it, the way the marks are given

Free interactive practice at using the material, which is what the marks are for.

Start revising free

What you'll cover

What parties are for

A political party is an organised group that seeks to win power in order to put its ideas into effect. This topic asks two questions about them. **What do they actually do?** Gather scattered views into a programme, put up candidates, offer voters a choice, and hold whoever wins to account. **Do they make democracy better or worse?** There are serious arguments on both sides, and a good answer gives both. The second half of this module covers **traditional left-wing and right-wing views** on the economy, education, the environment and immigration. **Two ground rules for that half.** No party is named, because the specification asks about the traditions rather than about particular organisations. And no view is presented as the correct one. ⚠️ One thing that matters here: **in Northern Ireland the main division between parties has historically been the constitutional question rather than the economic left-right axis**, so these labels fit NI politics less neatly than they fit some other systems.

Match each function to what it means

  • Representation of interests
  • Recruitment
  • Policy formation
  • Accountability
  • Gathering scattered opinions into a coherent programme, so that a large number of people can be represented by one set of proposals
  • Finding, selecting and preparing the people who will stand for election and, if they win, govern
  • Working out a set of proposals and publishing them together, so voters are choosing a package rather than a personality
  • Providing an organised opposition that scrutinises the government between elections and offers an alternative at them

Do parties help democracy?

Which answer would an examiner most reward?

  • That they do both: they make choice meaningful and organise opposition, but party discipline can mean a representative votes as instructed rather than as their constituents would want
  • That they are essential to democracy and have no drawbacks
  • That they damage democracy and should be abolished
  • That it is impossible to say

The case for and against

Both columns are arguments people make seriously. A strong answer uses material from each.

Two starting points

Before any list of policies, understand where each tradition begins. **Every position in the next few steps follows from one of these two premises**, and knowing that is worth more than memorising eight policies. **The traditional left-wing starting point**: a person's outcomes are strongly shaped by circumstances they did not choose, so collective action through the state can and should reduce those inequalities. **The traditional right-wing starting point**: individuals are best placed to make their own decisions, and concentrated state power and high taxation reduce the freedom and enterprise that create prosperity in the first place. **Both are coherent, and both are held by thoughtful people.** In an exam you will be asked to explain them, sometimes to evaluate them, and never to declare a winner. **The safest and strongest habit is to state each position in the form its own supporters would recognise.** A caricature is easy to knock down and earns nothing, because the examiner can see you have not understood what you are arguing against.

Four issues, two traditions

The specification names four. Each definition gives both traditional positions, because that is how they should be learned.

Traditionally left-wing

Select the TWO positions that follow from the traditional left-wing starting point.

  • Higher taxation on higher incomes, used to fund public services available to everyone
  • Comprehensive schooling with equal access regardless of what a family can pay
  • Lower taxation so that individuals and businesses keep more of what they earn
  • Greater parental choice between different types of school

Traditionally right-wing

Select the TWO positions that follow from the traditional right-wing starting point.

  • Meeting environmental targets through innovation and incentives rather than through binding regulation
  • Treating control of who enters the country as an aspect of national sovereignty
  • Public ownership or close regulation of key industries
  • Emphasising obligations towards refugees and the contribution migrants make

Match each issue to what is really being argued about

  • The economy
  • Education
  • The environment
  • Immigration
  • How large a role the state should have, and whether prosperity is better raised by redistribution or by enterprise
  • Whether standards rise faster through uniform provision and equal access, or through choice and competition between schools
  • Whether protection is better achieved by binding rules or by incentives and innovation, and who bears the cost either way
  • Where the balance lies between openness and control, and how quickly a society can absorb change

Parties and positions

A political party gathers scattered opinions into a programme and publishes them together as a _____, so that voters choose a package rather than an individual. Parties also provide an organised _____, which scrutinises the government between elections. The traditional _____ starting point holds that outcomes are shaped by circumstances people did not choose, so collective action can reduce inequality. The traditional _____ starting point holds that individuals are best placed to make their own decisions and that high taxation reduces _____. In Northern Ireland the main division between parties has historically been the _____ question rather than the economic one.

manifesto opposition left-wing right-wing enterprise constitutional referendum government equality environmental

Judging the party system

**"Do political parties strengthen or weaken democracy? (12 marks)"** "Parties do things a democracy could not easily do without them. A manifesto lets voters judge a package of proposals rather than guess what an individual candidate might do once elected, and because a party can be removed collectively at an election, responsibility for a government's record is identifiable. Parties also organise opposition, which is how a government is scrutinised between elections rather than only at them. **The criticisms are equally real and rest on the same feature.** The discipline that makes a party able to govern is also what can require a representative to vote as instructed rather than as their constituents would want. Falling membership means a shrinking number of people select the candidates everyone else votes on. And a voter must accept the whole package, including the parts they disagree with. **In Northern Ireland there is a further complication worth noting**: the main division between parties has historically run along the constitutional question rather than the economic left-right axis, so the choice a voter makes is not always the choice this model describes. **On balance, parties are the mechanism that makes representative democracy workable, and the faults identified are faults of that mechanism rather than reasons to abandon it.** The question worth asking is not whether to have parties but how open their selection and their internal decision-making are." **Two things to copy.** The criticisms are traced back to the SAME feature that produces the benefits, which is what makes it an analysis rather than two lists. And the conclusion reframes the question rather than just picking a side.

Spot the loaded language

A student's draft on the economy. Tap the TWO phrases that describe a position in language its own supporters would not accept, which loses marks for understanding.

  • The left tradition favours higher taxation to fund public services,
  • because it wants to take money away from people who have earned it
  • . The right tradition favours lower taxation and a smaller state,
  • because it does not care what happens to people who need help
  • . Both traditions claim their approach produces better outcomes overall.

State a position fairly

Build a sentence that states a position in the form its own supporters would recognise.

Writing about a contested issue

An exam question asks you to explain traditional left- and right-wing views on immigration. Work out how to handle it.

  • You hold strong views on this yourself. What do you do with them?
  • You are describing the position you disagree with. How should you write it?
  • The question asks you to evaluate, not just explain. Does that change things?

Your turn: parties and democracy

Explain what political parties do, whether they strengthen democracy, and how the two traditions differ on one major issue.

  • Name three functions political parties perform and explain what each involves
  • Give one argument that parties strengthen democracy and one that they narrow it
  • State the underlying starting point of each of the two traditions
  • Choose ONE of the four issues and explain both traditional positions on it, writing each in the form its own supporters would recognise