DoRevision

UK Landscape Introduction

Natural is not the same as looks empty. There is no untouched landscape in the UK, so the question is never whether people shaped a place but how much, and how easily you can see it.

⏱️ 20 min 🎯 16 activities
Best used for
Intervention Mock preparation Cover lesson

Use it, the way the marks are given

Free interactive practice at using the material, which is what the marks are for.

Start revising free

What you'll cover

The emptiest place on the map is not untouched

Picture the wildest place you can think of in the UK. Open moor, no trees, no buildings, no fences, nothing but ground and weather. Most people would call that a natural landscape. It is the obvious thing to call it. ⚠️⚠️ AND IT IS BARE PARTLY BECAUSE OF PEOPLE. Ground like that was wooded once. The trees were cleared, a long time ago, and animals have grazed there ever since, which is what stops new trees growing back. Leave it completely alone for long enough and much of it would turn back into woodland. ⭐⭐ SO THE OPENNESS THAT MAKES IT LOOK UNTOUCHED IS ITSELF SOMETHING PEOPLE DID. THE EMPTIEST-LOOKING GROUND IN THE COUNTRY IS SOME OF THE MOST MANAGED. This matters because of a distinction you are about to meet, and which is easy to get exactly wrong: BUILT and NATURAL. ⚠️ THOSE TWO WORDS ARE NOT TWO PILES TO SORT UK LANDSCAPES INTO. THERE IS NO UNTOUCHED LANDSCAPE IN THE UK AT ALL. Not one. People have been altering every part of this country for thousands of years, clearing, farming, draining, grazing, building, and there is nowhere the process skipped.SO THE REAL QUESTION IS NEVER "IS THIS ONE NATURAL OR BUILT?". IT IS "HOW MUCH HAVE PEOPLE DONE HERE, AND HOW EASY IS IT TO SEE?" In a city it is impossible to miss. In a field of wheat it is obvious once you notice that wheat does not plant itself in rows. On open moor it is invisible unless somebody tells you, which is exactly why the mistake gets made. ⚠️ NATURAL IS NOT THE SAME AS LOOKS EMPTY. WRITE THAT DOWN. Now for the other word in this topic's title, which is DISTINCTIVE. Your specification asks what makes a landscape distinctive, and it names three things: the GEOLOGY, the CLIMATE, and the HUMAN ACTIVITY. ⭐⭐ THREE THINGS ARE NAMED BECAUSE THE ANSWER IS ALWAYS ALL THREE AT ONCE. A place does not look the way it does because of its rock, or because of its weather, or because of its people. It looks that way because of what those three have done together, over a very long time. Carry one question through everything that follows: what would this place look like if people had never been here, and how different is that from what I can actually see?

Three things that make a place look like itself

The UK divides roughly into higher ground in the north and west and lower ground in the south and east. Here is what each is like, and the thing both have in common.

Find the highest ground in the far north

Shading shows height on this map, and the darker the ground the higher it is. Tap the area of highest ground in the far north, which is the part of the country most often described as wild.

Bare, and not for the reason you think

A student looks at open upland moor with no trees on it and writes that it is a natural landscape because people have not changed it. Why is that wrong?

  • Ground like that was wooded before people cleared it, and grazing animals since have stopped the trees returning, so its openness is itself the result of human activity
  • Because upland areas are protected, and protection counts as human activity
  • Because the high rainfall there stops trees from growing
  • Nothing is wrong: with no buildings visible, natural is the right description

Five words for describing a place

Five terms, each defined by what it is. Using them accurately is most of what a description question rewards.

Match each place to what most shaped it

  • Open upland moor with almost no trees on it
  • Very flat, very low farmland crossed by straight water channels
  • Steep, rocky high ground in the far north
  • Gently rolling lowland of hedged fields and villages
  • Ground so completely covered by buildings that the shape of the land beneath is hard to make out
  • Woodland cleared long ago, and grazing ever since, which together stop the trees coming back
  • Wetland deliberately drained to turn ground that was too wet into ground that could grow crops
  • Hard, old rock that has resisted wearing away far better than the softer rock elsewhere
  • Centuries of farming laid over deep soil, dividing the ground into a pattern of enclosed fields
  • Building dense enough to replace the surface entirely rather than merely sit on top of it

Two that follow from nowhere being untouched

Select the TWO statements that follow from there being no untouched landscape in the UK.

  • The difference between an upland and a lowland landscape is how visible the human work is, not whether there is any
  • Explaining why a place looks the way it does needs geology, climate and human activity together, not whichever one seems most obvious
  • UK landscapes can be sorted into a natural group and a built group
  • Only cities and farmland count as landscapes, since moorland has nothing in it

Describing what makes a place distinctive

Questions on this topic tend to show you a photograph or a map and ask what gives the place its character, or why it looks the way it does. ⚠️ AND THE COMMONEST ANSWER IS A LIST OF THINGS THAT ARE VISIBLE, WHICH IS DESCRIPTION RATHER THAN EXPLANATION. A shape that works on nearly any view you are given.START WITH THE SHAPE OF THE LAND. High or low, steep or gentle. This is the easiest thing to see and the easiest to describe precisely, so do it properly and do it first. THEN THE ROCK, IF YOU CAN TELL ANYTHING ABOUT IT. Hard old rock tends to stand high because it wears away slowly; softer rock tends to be lower ground. You are not being asked to name the rock, only to connect hardness to height. THEN THE CLIMATE, AND WHAT IT ALLOWS TO GROW. Wetter and colder ground supports grass and low plants; drier and milder ground with deeper soil supports crops. ⭐⭐ THEN THE PEOPLE, AND THIS IS THE ONE TO SPEND TIME ON, BECAUSE IT IS WHERE THE MARKS ARE AND IT IS THE ONE STUDENTS RUSH. What is the land used for? What has been put on it? And what has been REMOVED from it, which is the half almost nobody writes about? ⚠️ THEN JOIN THEM UP, BECAUSE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IS A COMBINATION AND A LIST OF THREE SEPARATE FACTS IS NOT ONE.THE JOINING WORDS DO THE WORK: "BECAUSE", "WHICH MEANS", "AND SO". Hard rock, so high ground, so more rain, so thin soil, so grazing rather than crops, so few trees and few people. That is one chain, and it is worth far more than four separate observations. ⚠️ THREE HABITS THAT COST MARKS HERE. ⚠️ THE FIRST IS CALLING SOMETHING NATURAL BECAUSE IT LOOKS EMPTY. Say what people have done there instead, even when it is invisible, and especially when it is invisible. ⚠️ THE SECOND IS STOPPING AT WHAT IS IN THE PICTURE. What is absent can matter more than what is present, and missing trees are the classic case. ⚠️ AND THE THIRD IS EXPLAINING EVERYTHING WITH ONE CAUSE.A PLACE IS NOT LIKE THAT BECAUSE OF ITS ROCK. IT IS LIKE THAT BECAUSE OF WHAT THE ROCK, THE WEATHER AND THE PEOPLE HAVE DONE TOGETHER, AND SAYING SO IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A DESCRIPTION AND AN EXPLANATION.

One hillside, read three ways

Stand at the bottom of a hill in the north-west of the country and look up it. Here is everything you can see: steep ground rising away from you, bare rock showing through in places, rough grass, no trees at all, a stone wall running up the slope, and sheep. ⚠️ A WEAK ANSWER LISTS THOSE THINGS BACK. THEY ARE ALL TRUE AND THE LIST EXPLAINS NOTHING.READING ONE. THE ROCK. The ground is high and steep, and high steep ground usually means rock that is hard and old enough to have worn away more slowly than the ground around it. That is why the hill is still a hill. ⚠️ AND IT ALREADY EXPLAINS THE BARE PATCHES, because on a slope that steep the soil is thin and easily washed off, so rock shows through.READING TWO. THE WEATHER. High ground in the north and west is wetter and colder than low ground in the south and east. Thin soil plus a lot of rain plus cold is a hard place to grow a crop and a perfectly good place to grow rough grass. So nobody is growing wheat here. Not because farmers have not thought of it. ⭐⭐ READING THREE. THE PEOPLE, AND THIS IS WHERE THE VIEW STOPS BEING OBVIOUS. The sheep are the easy part. Somebody put them there, and the wall was built to control where they go, and both of those are human work you can point at. ⚠️⚠️ NOW THE HARD PART. THE MOST IMPORTANT HUMAN THING IN THAT VIEW IS THE ABSENCE OF TREES, AND ABSENCE IS EXACTLY WHAT A DESCRIPTION MISSES. Ground like this carried woodland once. It was cleared, and the sheep that came afterwards eat young trees, so nothing grows back. Take the sheep away and leave it alone for a very long time and the hill would look completely different.SO THE THING THAT MAKES THAT VIEW LOOK WILD IS THE THING PEOPLE DID TO IT. And now join it up into one chain, which is what a strong answer does. Hard rock, so the ground stayed high. High ground, so more rain and colder. More rain and thin soil, so grass rather than crops. Grass, so sheep rather than ploughing. Sheep, so no young trees survive. No trees, so it looks untouched. ⚠️ SIX LINKS, ONE SENTENCE EACH, AND EVERY ONE OF THEM CAUSED BY THE ONE BEFORE. THAT IS WHAT THIS TOPIC IS ASKING YOU TO BE ABLE TO DO.

Order how to read a landscape

Put these six moves into the order that turns a list of visible things into an explanation.

  • Describe the shape of the land: how high it is and how steep
  • Connect that height to the hardness of the rock underneath it
  • Add what the climate at that height allows to grow
  • Say what the land is used for, and what has been put on it
  • Ask what has been removed, since what is missing is often the human work
  • Join it into one chain of causes rather than leaving separate observations

Build the distinctive character sentence

This is the sentence that answers a "what makes this place distinctive" question. Assemble it.

The distinctive landscape run

Five questions on why UK places look the way they do. Three lives.

Two claims you can defend

Tap the TWO statements you could defend in an exam answer on this topic.

  • UK landscapes differ in how visible the human work is, rather than in whether there is any
  • What has been removed from a landscape can matter more to its appearance than what has been added
  • An area with no buildings in view can fairly be described as an untouched natural landscape
  • The rock underneath a place is enough on its own to explain the way that place looks

Complete the UK landscape facts

Everything you can see when you look across an area of land is the _____. The rock an area is made of, including how old and how hard it is, is its _____. What an area of land is currently used for is its _____. Open upland with few or no trees, covered largely by low-growing vegetation, is _____.

landscape geology land use moorland relief climate soil depth settlement

Three field notes to fix

Three students describe a view. Everything each of them writes is accurate, and each stops one step short.

  • A student writes: the land is high and steep, there are no trees, there is rough grass and some sheep, and there is a stone wall. What is missing?
  • A student writes that the area is a natural landscape because there are no buildings and no roads in sight. How would you improve it?
  • A student explains a lowland farming landscape entirely by its deep soil, without mentioning climate or human activity. What is the weakness?

Explain what makes one landscape distinctive

Choose ONE kind of UK landscape, either an upland area in the north and west or a lowland area in the south and east. Explain what gives it its distinctive character, and explain how human activity has shaped it even where that is not obvious to look at.

  • Start by describing the shape of the land: how high it is, and how steep or gentle
  • Connect that height to the hardness of the rock underneath, since harder rock wears away more slowly
  • Add what the climate at that height and in that part of the country allows to grow
  • Say what the land is used for, and what people have put on it
  • Then say what people have REMOVED, and explain why an absence can shape a view more than anything added to it
  • Join your points into one chain of causes using words like because, which means and so, rather than listing three separate factors
  • Finish by saying why calling your chosen landscape natural or built would be the wrong question to ask about it