DoRevision

Urbanisation Patterns

Urbanisation is not one story. The same word names opposite movements: people pouring into fast-growing cities in poorer countries, and moving out and then back in richer ones. The skill is matching the mechanism to the place.

⏱️ 20 min 🎯 15 activities
Best used for
Intervention Mock preparation Cover lesson

Use it, the way the marks are given

Free interactive practice at using the material, which is what the marks are for.

Start revising free

What you'll cover

One word, two directions

More than half the world now lives in towns and cities, and it is tempting to learn urbanisation as a single rising line on a graph. That misses the whole point of this topic. ⭐ Urbanisation is not one story. The same word describes OPPOSITE movements of people, depending on how developed a country is. In low-income developing countries, cities are growing fast because people are pouring INTO them from the countryside, and because the young populations that arrive have children of their own. In advanced countries, the movement is tangled and often runs the other way: out of the inner city to the suburbs, out past the suburbs to the countryside, and then, for some, back into revived city centres. ⭐⭐ So the exam skill is not to describe urbanisation in general. It is to read how developed a place is, and match the right mechanism to it. ⚠️ Carry that through everything below: which development level, and therefore which direction are people moving?

Pouring in, and moving about

Set the two mechanisms side by side. They are what the specification wants you to contrast, because they work in completely different ways.

Order how a city grows fast

In a low-income developing country, put the stages of rapid urban growth into order.

  • Hardship in the countryside pushes people to look elsewhere
  • They migrate to the city, pulled by the promise of work and services
  • The migrants are mostly young, and have children in the city
  • The city grows faster than housing and services can be built
  • Informal settlements grow where planned housing has not kept up

Where the biggest cities are now

How has the distribution of the world largest cities changed since 1950?

  • It has shifted: in 1950 most of the largest cities were in the richer, developed world, but a growing share are now in low-income and emerging countries
  • It has not changed: the largest cities are still where they were in 1950
  • The largest cities are all now in the developed world
  • There are no longer any large cities in developed countries

Words for a changing urban world

Five terms, each defined so you can use it in a sentence rather than only recognise it.

Tap the two about advanced countries

Tap the TWO statements that describe the urban trends of ADVANCED countries, not low-income ones.

  • People move out of the city to live in the countryside and commute or work remotely
  • Renewed city centres draw some people back to live in them
  • The city grows very rapidly as people arrive from the countryside in large numbers
  • Informal settlements spread because housing cannot keep pace with arrivals

Which drive rapid city growth

Select the TWO that drive the rapid urban growth of low-income developing countries.

  • Rural-to-urban migration, as people move to the city for work and services
  • Natural increase, as the young people who migrate have children in the city
  • Counter-urbanisation, as people leave the city for the countryside
  • Suburbanisation, as people spread out to the suburbs

Matching the mechanism to the place

One routine answers almost any question on this topic, and it is what the specification is really testing. ⭐ First, read the development level. Is the place a low-income developing country, an emerging one, or an advanced country? That single fact predicts the pattern. ⭐ If it is low-income or emerging, expect rapid growth, and the movement is INWARD. Rural-to-urban migration plus natural increase, faster than housing can follow. ⭐ If it is advanced, expect slow change, and the movement is MIXED. Out to the suburbs, out to the countryside, and back into renewed centres. ⭐ Then contrast them on purpose. A strong answer does not just describe one; it says why the two mechanisms differ, because they are driven by completely different things. ⚠️ Describe low-income cities fairly: they face real pressures, but they are also places of work, energy and opportunity, which is exactly why people move to them.

Match each term to the movement

  • Rural-urban migration
  • Suburbanisation
  • Counter-urbanisation
  • Re-urbanisation
  • Natural increase
  • People moving from the countryside into the city
  • People moving from the inner city out to the surrounding edges
  • People moving right out of the city to the countryside and small towns
  • People moving back into a city centre that has been renewed
  • Growth from more births than deaths, with no one moving anywhere

The flow at a party

Leave geography aside and picture a party over an evening. Early on, the movement is all one way: people arriving through the front door, the room filling up quickly, a bit chaotic as everyone finds their feet.Later, the movement reverses and tangles. Some drift out to the garden for air. A few decide to head home. And near the end, when someone puts on the right song, a handful come back inside to the front room. ⭐⭐ Now here is the point. If someone only asked whether people were coming or going, they would get a useless answer, because it depends entirely on WHEN in the evening you look. The same word, the movement at the party, describes filling up, spreading out, leaving, and coming back, and which one it is depends on the stage the evening has reached. That is the shape to carry back. A single word can name opposite flows, and you only know which one by reading the stage things have reached.

Complete the urbanisation facts

The rising share of people living in towns and cities is called _____. In low-income countries it happens rapidly, driven by rural-to-urban _____: the countryside has _____ factors driving people away, and the city has _____ factors drawing them in. A city of more than ten million people is called a _____. In advanced countries the trend can run the other way, as _____, the movement of people out of cities to the countryside.

urbanisation migration push pull megacity counter-urbanisation

Build the contrast

Assemble a sentence that contrasts the two mechanisms explicitly, which is what a strong answer does.

The urban patterns run

Five quick decisions. Three lives.

Match the mechanism to the place

You are given three places at different levels of development. For each, work out which urban mechanism fits.

  • A low-income country whose capital is growing very fast, with new arrivals from rural areas and many informal settlements. What is happening?
  • An advanced country where families are leaving the city to live in villages and commute or work from home. What is happening?
  • In the same advanced country, a run-down city centre has been renewed with new flats and jobs, and young people are moving back in. What is happening?

Explain why urbanisation differs

Some people say urbanisation means the same thing everywhere. Using low-income developing countries and advanced countries, explain why that is misleading, and how the pattern differs between them.

  • Explain what urbanisation means, and that more than half the world now lives in urban areas
  • Explain the rapid inward growth of low-income cities, through migration and natural increase
  • Explain the contrasting advanced-country trends of suburbanisation, counter-urbanisation and re-urbanisation
  • Use the terms rural-urban migration and counter-urbanisation correctly
  • Reach a supported judgement about how far urbanisation is one pattern or several