The Whole-Text Arguer
Part b) is closed book and asks about the whole text. Learn to make an argument instead of retelling the plot, to reach for evidence from more than one point in the story, and to weave context in rather than bolting it on.
Use it, the way the marks are given
Free interactive practice at using the material, which is what the marks are for.
Start revising freeWhat you'll cover
The half you cannot look up
Part b) gives you a question on your studied text and nothing else. **No extract, no book.** Everything you use has to come out of your own head. That changes what a good answer looks like. You cannot work outwards from a passage in front of you, so you have to arrive with an **argument about the whole text** and the evidence to run it. This module is about building that, and about the one habit that sinks more part b) answers than anything else.
Telling the story is not answering
Under pressure, with no text in front of you, the easiest thing to write is what happens. It is also the thing that scores worst.
Which one is an argument?
Which opening sentence sets up an answer rather than a retelling?
- The play presents loyalty as something the characters can no longer afford, and it costs each of them differently.
- The play begins with the family at home, and then the factory announces the closure.
- There are many interesting themes in this play which the writer explores in different ways.
- The play was written at a time of great social change in Britain.
What a whole-text answer is made of
Five moves. An answer missing the first or the last rarely reaches the top band.
Weakest to strongest
Four openings to the same question on a practice play called "The Long Shift". Put them in order from weakest to strongest.
- "The Long Shift is about a family who work at a factory that closes down."
- "The writer uses lots of techniques to show the theme of loyalty in an interesting way."
- "The play suggests that loyalty survives longest in the people who can least afford it."
- "The play suggests that loyalty survives longest in the people who can least afford it, and it is hardest on the youngest character, who has the most to lose by staying."
Context has to be doing a job
AO3 is assessed on this half, and it is where answers most often lose marks while looking as though they are trying. **Bolted on:** "The play was written in the 1980s, a time of industrial decline in Britain. Many factories closed and unemployment was high." **Integrated:** "When the father insists the factory will reopen, an audience watching in the 1980s would have recognised a hope that was already failing across the country, which makes his refusal to look for other work read as denial rather than loyalty." Same knowledge. The second one is inside an argument about a character, so it earns AO1 and AO2 as well as AO3. A context paragraph that answers no question earns one of the three at best.
Which context is working?
Select the TWO statements where context is doing something for the argument.
- The father's certainty that the factory will reopen would have read as denial to an audience who had watched the same promise fail elsewhere
- The daughter's decision to leave carries more weight when you know how few options were opening elsewhere at the time
- In the 1980s, many factories in Britain closed and unemployment rose sharply
- The writer grew up in a town with a factory, which is interesting background
Write the thesis
The question is "How does the writer present loyalty in the play?". Build a thesis that could carry a whole answer.
Which sentence does the analysis?
A model paragraph on the practice play. Tap the ONE sentence that analyses HOW the writing works, rather than stating a point or giving evidence.
- The father's loyalty is presented as a refusal to see.
- He tells his daughter the machines are "only resting".
- The word "resting" grants the machines a life they no longer have, and the audience hears him comforting himself in a phrase meant to comfort her.
- Audiences at the time had watched the same promise fail across the country.
Match each weakness to the fix
- The answer walks through the plot
- All the evidence comes from one scene
- Context sits in its own paragraph
- The conclusion repeats the introduction
- Write the thesis first, and open every paragraph by answering the question again
- Deliberately reach for a short quotation from early, middle and late in the text
- Move it inside a point, so it changes how a character or moment is read
- End somewhere the opening did not already say, having weighed the strongest objection
One paragraph, all four objectives
**"How does the writer present loyalty in the play?"** "The father's loyalty is presented as a refusal to see. He tells his daughter the machines are 'only resting', and the word grants them a life they no longer have, so the audience hears him comforting himself in a phrase meant to comfort her. Watching in the 1980s, when the same promise had already failed elsewhere, that certainty would have read as denial rather than faith. By the final scene he is still waiting, and the play has quietly turned his best quality into the thing that traps him." Point, short quotation, analysis of the wording, context that changes the reading, then evidence from later in the text. Four sentences, and nothing in it is plot summary.
Fill in the plan
Before writing, settle the _____ in one sentence. Then choose three points that each defend it from a different angle. Make sure the evidence comes from more than one _____ of the text, so the answer is about the whole thing. Put any context _____ a point rather than in its own paragraph. Finish with a _____ that has moved from where the introduction started, having dealt with the strongest _____ to your reading.
Why spread the evidence?
Your three best quotations all come from the same scene. Why is that a problem in part b)?
- Because the question is about the whole text, and evidence from one scene can only show what happens there, not how the writer develops the idea
- Because you need more quotations than that to fill the time
- Because the examiner will think you only remembered one scene
- It is not a problem, as long as the quotations are good ones
Forty minutes, no book
You have turned over to part b). Work through the first few minutes.
- You read the question and your mind goes to the scene you revised most. What should you do first?
- You have a thesis. Two of your three planned quotations come from the opening scene. What now?
- Ten minutes left and one point still unwritten. What is the best use of the time?
Your turn: argue about your own text
Take a major theme from the modern text your school is studying and write the opening of a part b) answer about it. Use your own text, not the practice play.
- Open with a thesis: one sentence answering a question about that theme
- Make one point that defends it, with a short quotation you can remember exactly
- Analyse the wording of that quotation, not just what it means
- Add one piece of context INSIDE the point, so it changes how the moment reads