DoRevision
Teacher guide

How DoRevision writes its teacher material

Everything on these pages is written by a named person, dated, and checked against the exam board's published specification rather than written from memory. Where we mention research, we say which study we mean. Where we give a number about DoRevision, we say how it was counted, and we only use numbers our own database can produce. Nothing is published without a person reading it first. If you find a mistake, tell us. We'll correct the page and change its review date so you can see that it happened. This page covers who writes the material, what reviewed actually means, how we check specification alignment, and what to do when something on the site is wrong.

Teachers are asked to trust a lot of revision material that nobody has put their name to. This page is here so you can decide how much to trust ours.

Who writes it

Every teacher page names the person who wrote it. Where someone else has checked it, that person is named too. If a page carries a name, that person is answerable for what it says.

We'd rather leave a topic uncovered than publish something under a name that doesn't mean anything, so you'll sometimes find a gap here.

What "reviewed" means

A review date tells you when a person last read the whole page against the current specification and the current state of the site. It isn't the date the file was last edited.

We re-review a page when any of these happen:

  • The exam board publishes a revised specification.
  • The revision content the page points at changes.
  • A reader reports something that turns out to be wrong.

How specification alignment is checked

Revision content is mapped to a specification before any of it is written. We do that mapping against the exam board's own published specification document, and it records the topic structure and the assessment detail for that board and that subject.

Modules are then built against that map, so each one is tied to real specification points. You can see the result on the revision pages, where each specification lists its topics and the modules that cover them, next to the official past papers for the same qualification.

Every question is marked on the server against a stored answer key. We also check the whole library automatically for questions a student could answer by guessing, or by spotting a pattern in the options. Anything that fails those checks is rewritten before it goes live.

What we won't do

We don't publish invented quotes, invented schools, or claims about results that we can't show the working for. Our policy on evidence and citation is set out separately, on the evidence page.

Telling us something is wrong

Corrections are welcome, and we'd much rather have them than not. Tell us which page, what's wrong and what it should say. We'll fix the page and move its review date.

Put one in front of a class

Tell us the subject and how long you have. You get a link to hand out, and it marks itself.

Create a free teacher account

Written by David Wright, Co-Founder, DoRevision.

David builds DoRevision with his son Noah (15). David has spent his career building EdTech products, and Noah has grown up watching lines of code being written. As a student at an important stage of his education, together they are building the revision platform that Noah is using to help revise for his GCSE exams and hopes his friends will find useful too.

Spotted an error on this page? [email protected]

How DoRevision writes its teacher material How DoRevision uses evidence and cites sources

Related for teachers

  • How DoRevision uses evidence and cites sources The rules DoRevision follows when a teacher page makes a claim: what gets a citation, how we label our own data, and the claims we won't make at all. Written so you can check our working.